Consumer hardware · Tooling
Budget for a second mould, not a perfect first one.
Price the first tool as a prototype you will throw away, and hold the difference for the replacement.
Shipped on the second tool, four months late
Wanjiru Kamau
@wanjiru-tooling
Written by someone who worked on it.
An injection-moulding programme in Nairobi spent four months and two revisions trying to get one tool right, and shipped six weeks after switching to a cheap tool it expected to replace.
Problem
The team specified a hardened steel tool for a part whose geometry was still moving. Every design change became a tool change, and a tool change on hardened steel is a welding job.
Context
A five-person team making a water filter housing. First tool quoted at 8,400 USD with a six-week lead time; two revisions took it past four months.
What they did
- Cut a soft aluminium tool for the same part at roughly a fifth of the cost and a third of the lead time.
- Ran 400 shots off the aluminium tool and froze the geometry against real parts rather than drawings.
- Ordered the steel tool only after two consecutive runs needed no change.
- Kept the aluminium tool as the backup for short colour runs instead of scrapping it.
What to avoid
- Two of the three geometry changes came from assembly, not from the moulded part, and would not have been caught by more CAD review.
- The steel tool's quoted lead time did not include the tryout loop, which added three weeks each time.
- Nobody costed the idle line while the tool was away being modified.
The business facts
- Timeline
- 9 months from first tool order to shipping
- Rafiki Housewares
- Nairobi, 2023
- First tool cost
- $8,400
- Aluminium tool cost
- $1,680
- Shots off the aluminium tool
- 400
Sources
- Tooling quotes and revision logRafiki Housewares programme notes
Related lessons
- tooling
- injection-molding
- manufacturing
29,870 views