Market Research

Two ways to find something worth building: what people are reporting as problems, and what this country is paying foreigners for. Both are ranked; neither is combined into the other.

Country · 2019–2024 · 60,550 trade records

Commodities tracked: 5,668
Imports across the top 24: $25.6B
Categories with demand signal: 1
Demand as of: Sep 13, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
Top feasibility score: 45/100
Feasibility as of: Nov 10, 2026 · 00:00 UTC

Nothing has been scored for this country yet.

Both signals agree

Categories where people are reporting problems and the country imports heavily. A coincidence worth looking at — not a combined score. The two numbers count different things and are shown separately for that reason.

No category currently clears the bar on both sides. That is a real finding: it means the problems people are reporting and the goods the country buys abroad are not pointing at the same place yet.

Joined on the research category, which is the coarsest link available — eight categories cover every commodity. Treat it as a hint about where to look, not as a match between a reported problem and a product.

Ruled out, and why

A ranking is only as honest as its exclusions.

5,317commodities are in the catalogue but not in the ranking — the country records no imports of them. Scoring a commodity nobody buys would publish a feasibility number with no market behind it, so they are excluded before ranking rather than sorted to the bottom.
Demand cells with no scoring run are absent from the leaderboard rather than shown as zero. A zero would be a finding about the world; the absence is a fact about the job.
Tariffs, duty rates and landed cost are not modelled at all. A duty rate is jurisdictional and dated, and a landed cost needs a per-supplier price this platform deliberately does not hold — so no figure here is a cost of doing the thing.